Have you been Charged with a Road Traffic Offence in Mornington?
If you’ve been charged with a road traffic offence in Mornington, Dribbin & Brown Traffic Lawyers can assist.
Table of Contents
If you’ve been charged with a road traffic offence in Mornington, Dribbin & Brown Traffic Lawyers can assist.
DRINK DRIVING Charge, Fines, Lawyers Melbourne Dribbin & Brown Criminal Lawyers, only practice in Criminal & Traffic Law.
WHY YOU NEED LEGAL ADVICE IF YOU’VE BEEN CAUGHT DRINK- DRUG DRIVING Introduction Drink or drug driving charges are the most commonly issued charges by Victoria Police, eclipsing both assault and property charges.
PROFESSIONAL DRIVERS CAUGHT DRUG DRIVING Introduction While drug related problems can arise in any industry, it has been found to be a particular issue amongst professional drivers, some of whom take illicit substances in an attempt to increase their ability to work without rest.
DRINK AND DRUG DRIVING – CASE STUDY Introduction Both drink driving and drug driving are serious offences and the laws are enforced very strictly by the police and law courts in Victoria.
CHOOSING A DRINK DRIVING LAWYER IF YOU HAVE BEEN CHARGED DRINK DRIVING Introduction Victoria Police conduct between 3.5 and 4 million random breath tests every year, and conduct over 3000 roadside drug tests every month.
DRINK DRIVING LAW AMENDMENT -VICTORIA Introduction Victorian magistrates take drink driving matters very seriously.
Charges: Exceed Prescribed Content of alcohol both section 49(1)(b) & (f), being a reading of .074. Alternative to be withdrawn.
Charges: Fail to Nominate Driver section 60 Road Safety Act (RSA); Dangerous Driving section 64 RSA; Careless Driving section 65 RSA (3 demerit points); Improper Use of Motor Vehicle section 65A RSA (no demerit points).
Charges: Fail to Nominate Driver when requested to do so by a police member acting in the execution of their duties.
Drink Driving Frankston Charges: Drink Driving (BAC 0.074) section 49(1)(f) and s49(1)(b) of the Road Safety Act (Driving within 3 hours exceeding prescribed content of alcohol) Facts: The client had been drinking the night before and into the early hours of the morning.
Charges: Fail to Remain at the Scene of an Accident section 61(1)(a) Road Safety Act (RSA), Fail to Exchange details s61(1)(c) RSA; Careless Drive section 65 RSA.
Charges: Driving Whilst Suspended s30(1) Road Safety Act 1986, second offence.
Charges: The client was charged in the Moorabbin Justice Centre with Driving Whilst Disqualified. We abridged the matter to Frankston Magistrates Court, for a plea of guilty.
Facts: The client was applying to the Frankston Magistrates’ Court to become relicenced. The client had four prior offences relating to drink driving.
Charges: Fail to Stop Following Accident where Person Seriously Injured Section 61(3) of the Road Safety Act; Fail to Render Assistance where Person Seriously Injured; Careless Driving Section 65 of the Road Safety Act Facts: The client was driving his ute to work towing a tandem trailer.
Improper Use of Motor Vehicle Charges: The client was charged with Careless Driving section 65 of the Road Safety Act, Fail to have proper control of a motor vehicle section 297 of the Road Rules and Improper Use of a motor vehicle section 65A of the Road Safety Act.
Exceed Prescribed Content of Alcohol Charges: Driving Under the Influence, Exceed the Prescribed Content of Alcohol Whilst Driving reading at .22 section 49(1)(b) & (f).
Drink Driving Frankston Magistrates Court Charges: Driving Under the Influence; Exceed Prescribed Content of Alcohol (Drink Driving .186) Facts: The client worked in the hospitality industry and had been working late.
Charges: Driving Whilst Disqualified, Drink Driving by Exceeding the PCA (prescribed content of alcohol) reading at 0.12.
Need Help? Call our team 7am – 12 midnight (7 days a week)
Search